Van Loon v. Griffin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Stearns county, Collins, J., presiding, denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out the answer as sham.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
The complaint is a general count in assumpsit for goods sold and delivered to defendants on the 15th day of June, 1884. The answer sets up a^special contract between the parties, of the same date alleged in the complaint, under which, as it is alleged, plaintiff undertook to erect lightning-rods on defendants’ buildings in Sherburne county, specially alleging the-price agreed on; that defendants should have a year in which to accept or reject the rods; and that they had never accepted them, and plaintiff had never demanded payment. It also alleges certain warranties and representations made…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barker v. FosterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- City Bank v. DollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Corbett v. EnoNew York Supreme Court · 1861
- Manufacturers' Bank of Rochester v. HitchcockNew York Supreme Court · 1857
3Cited by9 opinions
- State ex rel. Engelhard v. WeberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Independent School District v. City of White Bear LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Bank of Richards v. SheasgreenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- First National Bank v. LangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Knudson v. PedersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.