Legal Opinion

City of Miami v. Romer

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 18, 1954PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

73 So.2d 285 (1954)

CITY OF MIAMI

v.

ROMER et al.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

June 18, 1954.

J.W. Watson, Jr., Olavi M. Hendrickson and Edward J. Fitzpatrick, Miami, for petitioner.

Chertkof & Kalish and Anderson & Nadeau, Miami, for respondents.

ROBERTS, Chief Justice.

This is the second appearance of this case before this court. See City of Miami v. Romer, Fla., 58 So.2d 849, for a complete report of the proceedings had in the trial court prior to its first appearance here.

Briefly stated, the facts are that the appellee, Romer, sued the appellant, City of Miami, to recover compensation for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gorieb v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Miller v. Beaver FallsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Caplan's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. City of Miami v. RomerSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  5. Widening of Chestnut StreetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hamer v. State Highway Commission of the MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. Department of Transp. v. GefenSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  3. Dade County v. StillSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  4. Fox v. Town of Bay Harbor IslandsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Scutti v. State Road DepartmentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API