Legal Opinion
Moen v. Minzel
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided July 10, 1957No. 8504PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Justice.
Appellants brought this action seeking specific performance by respondents of an instrument in the form of an alleged unexecuted contract for the sale and purchase of real property owned by respondents.
Appellants in their amended complaint allege that respondents own “Section 5, Township 51 North, Range 3 W.B.M., Hayden Lake, Kootenai County, Idaho,” comprising 640 acres known as E. C. Minzel ranch. The form of the alleged instrument of contract, however, attached to and made a part of the amended complaint, sets out that only respondents E. C. Minzel and Delores Minzel are the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- State v. DavidsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
- Zenier v. Spokane International Railroad CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
- Grant v. LongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hoffman v. SV Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Idaho Title Co. v. American States Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Cooper v. Boise Church of Christ of Boise, Idaho, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1974
- May v. Triangle Oil Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Hoffman v. SV Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981