May v. Triangle Oil Co., Inc.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiffs in an action upon a note. We reverse.
Plaintiffs-Appellants May and Paz brought this action for a balance due on a promissory note together with interest thereon and attorney fees. The note was executed and delivered to plaintiffs-appellants as part of the consideration paid by defendants-respondents in the purchase of a business establishment, in Pocatello, Idaho, known as the Syndicate Bar.
Defendants-respondents answered and counterclaimed admitting in essence all of the above facts but…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Huggins v. Green Top Dairy Farms, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Fischer v. FischerIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
- Berry v. KoehlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- Clayton v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- Hollandsworth v. Cottonwood Elevator CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brizendine v. Nampa Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Brizendine v. Nampa Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Dawson v. OlsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Dawson v. OlsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Shields v. MartinIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.