Legal Opinion

May v. Triangle Oil Co., Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1974No. 11312PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiffs in an action upon a note. We reverse.

Plaintiffs-Appellants May and Paz brought this action for a balance due on a promissory note together with interest thereon and attorney fees. The note was executed and delivered to plaintiffs-appellants as part of the consideration paid by defendants-respondents in the purchase of a business establishment, in Pocatello, Idaho, known as the Syndicate Bar.

Defendants-respondents answered and counterclaimed admitting in essence all of the above facts but…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Huggins v. Green Top Dairy Farms, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Fischer v. FischerIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Berry v. KoehlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Clayton v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Hollandsworth v. Cottonwood Elevator CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brizendine v. Nampa Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Brizendine v. Nampa Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Dawson v. OlsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Dawson v. OlsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Shields v. MartinIdaho Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API