Legal Opinion

In re the Construction of the Will of Wuppermann

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 29, 1949PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frankenthaler, S.

The necessity for a construction of the will arises from an apparent conflict between two paragraphs thereof concerning management powers of the trustee. The precise question is whether the trustee has the power to sell specific securities given in trust.

In article three of the will, testatrix bequeathed to her daughter, as trustee, 3,000 shares of common stock of the AngosturaWuppermann Corporation “ to invest and reinvest the same and to apply or pay over the net income ” to her three granddaughters equally and “ to pay over and transfer absolutely to each of said…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mertz v. Guaranty Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. In re the Estate of HerbNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  3. Toronto General Trusts Co. v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.New York Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. MixterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  5. In re the Estate of WechslerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. London v. GoodmanNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  2. In re the Estate of CramerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API