Legal Opinion

Toronto General Trusts Co. v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1892PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from special term, Hew York county. Action by the Toronto General Trusts Company, trustee, against the Chicago» Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company and the ¡National Bank of Commerce, of ¡New York, to recover certain shares of railroad stock. The complaint was-dismissed as to defendant railroad company, and judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff against defendant bank. Plaintiff and defendant bank ap*peal.

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

George f-I. Dunscomb, of Coburg, in Canada, died in Florida-, on March 25, 1871. He left a will, executed on December 14, 1870, whereby he specifically bequeathed to his wife certain stock and bonds, and gave certaim pecuniary legacies to his relatives. His wife was named as executrix, ands his brother John as executor. On the same day he executed a codicil, which,, except as to the appointment of said executrix and executor, superseded the-will, and was as follows: “In the event of my having issue by my wife, Harriette Catherine Dunscomb, I give, devise, and bequeath to my said wife, for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ackerman v. EmottNew York Supreme Court · 1848

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of PulitzerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  2. Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  3. Mertz v. Guaranty Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of First Trust & Deposit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  5. In re BlackmarNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API