Legal Opinion
London v. Goodman
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 28, 1957PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSamuel H. Hoestadter, J.
The defendant, Bernard A. Goodman, individually and as executor, and the defendant, Alice M. Goodman, as trustee under a will, move to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency and additionally to strike from it so much as alleges that the action is brought as a representative action on behalf of the executors and trustees under the same will. The defendant Ex-Lax, Inc. moves separately to dismiss the complaint as to it on the ground that no cause of action against it is stated. Both motions will be dealt with in one opinion.
The complaint states a single cause of action in favor of the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Wendt v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Pollitz v. . Wabash R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Wechsler v. BowmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. CannonNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. CarcelNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Bryan v. HolzerMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- George C. Matthies v. Seymour Manufacturing Company, George C. Matthies v. Earl B. Boies, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Reynolds v. SnowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- In re the Estate of WrightNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.