Legal Opinion

O'Donnell v. Archie's Motor Express

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 19, 1959No. Civ. A. Nos. 23640, 23399PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTIE, Circuit Judge.

These companion actions are before the court on motions of the defendant to dismiss the third-party defendant’s counterclaim as barred by the statute of limitations.

*37The controversy arises out of a fatal automobile collision in which one driver, Nee, and his passengers, Moran and Morton, were killed. The other vehicle was operated by Archie’s Motor Express.

As a result of this accident separate timely suits were filed against Archie’s at about the same time, the first on behalf of Nee in the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, and the second, this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Simodejka v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Gilmore v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  3. Roberts v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Sieger v. SiegerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fedders North America, Inc. v. Branded Products, Inc. (In Re Branded Products, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1993
  2. McDonald's Corp. v. LevineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. McDonald's Corp. v. LevineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API