Sieger v. Sieger
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 271, Jan. T., 1903, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. Lehigh Co., Jan. T., 1897, No. 62, on case tried by the court without a jury in suit of Mary C. Sieger, Administratrix of Charles S. Sieger, Deceased, et al. v. Amandus Sieger et al.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 271, Jan. T., 1903, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. Lehigh Co., Jan. T., 1897, No. 62, on case tried by the court without a jury in suit of Mary C. Sieger, Administratrix of Charles S. Sieger, Deceased, et al. v. Amandus Sieger et al. Assumpsit subsequently changed to account render for moneys had and received, by the following agreement: Now, July 5,1897, it is hereby agreed by the parties in above cases as follows: 1. That the rules of reference heretofore entered be stricken off. 2. That said two cases be consolidated into one action as of No. 62 January term, 1897, in…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Chief Justice Mitchell,
Plaintiffs as heirs of John Sieger brought separate suits in assumpsit against Amandus Sieger and Lewis A. Sieger, who had been tenants in common with J ohn, for their share of the profits of the estate in common, received by Amandus and Lewis since the death of J ohn. By agreement the two actions were consolidated into one and changed in form to account render. At the trial the defendants offered to prove that John had received in his lifetime more than his share of the profits for which he had failed to account and was thereby indebted to the defendants.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gilmore v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
- McGowan v. Bailey, Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Wisecarver v. KincaidSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sheridan v. CoughlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- O'Donnell v. Archie's Motor ExpressDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
- Deane v. Greenbaum, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1951