Legal Opinion
Edwin M. Reid, Doing Business as College Book Exchange v. Harper & Brothers
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 30, 1956No. 23849_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATERMAN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, Edwin M. Reid, doing business as The College Book Exchange, brought this action under § 2(a) of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robin son-Patman Act, 49 Stat. 1526, 15 U.S.C. A. § 13(a), alleging that defendant, Harper & Brothers, had violated the Act by charging him higher prices for its books than it charged his competitors, thereby rendering him unable to compete in the sale of Harper’s books. Treble damages were sought pursuant to Section 4 of the Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 15. He appeals from a judgment against him entered upon a jury verdict for the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Automatic Canteen Co. of America v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- American Can Co. v. Russellville Canning Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- Flint v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Pager v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
3Cited by5 opinions
- First Comics, Inc., and Cross-Appellee v. World Color Press, Inc., and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- National Dairy Products Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Motor Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Palmer News, Inc. v. ARA Services, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1979
- First Comics Inc. v. World Color PressDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987