Legal Opinion
People v. Kentron D.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 12, 2002No. B151154PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NOTT, Acting, P. J.
Kentron D., a ward of the juvenile court (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602) who had been placed in the camp community program, appeals from the order finding him in violation of probation, after which he was committed to the California Youth Authority. He was found to have violated the conditions of his probation following a contested hearing held upon the filing of a Welfare and Institutions Code section 777 (hereafter section 777) notice. We consider whether this finding of violation pursuant to section 777, as amended by Proposition 21, may be sustained where the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. AbramsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. GomezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- In Re Oscar R.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. AbramsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- In re R.F. CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2015