Legal Opinion

People v. Abrams

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 2007No. B194835PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUBIN, J.

Defendant Lonell Allan Abrams appeals his state prison sentence following revocation of probation on a charge of petty theft with prior convictions. Defendant contends the trial court erred in allowing hearsay evidence to prove his failure to comply with probation obligations. We hold that whether or not a defendant has reported to his probation officer or made monetary payments to the officer are essentially nontestimonial; thus, even if hearsay, they are admissible at a probation violation hearing. Because the trial court properly considered this evidence here, we affirm the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. People v. GeierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. AbramsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API