Legal Opinion

People v. Gomez

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 2010No. B213013PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MALLANO, P. J.

—Defendant Irvin Daniel Gomez appeals from a judgment revoking his probation and sentencing him to prison. Defendant contends the trial court abused its discretion and violated his due process rights by admitting in evidence a probation report which showed that defendant failed to report to his probation officer, pay restitution, or submit verification of his employment and attendance at counseling sessions. We disagree and affirm because the evidence admitted was in the nature of documentary material that is admissible in a probation revocation hearing.

BACKGROUND

On April…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. People v. PartidaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. People v. ArreolaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GuthrieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  2. People v. Buell, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. People v. Becker CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. People v. Becker CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. People v. BuellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API