Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. Reese

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 7, 1928No. Appeal, 207PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaefer,

Who are entitled to hold the office of poor directors in the County of Schuylkill is to be determined on this appeal. To arrive at the solution of the problem appellants say we must decide (1) whether the General Poor Relief Act of May 14, 1925, P. L. 762, is constitutional; (2) if it is, does this code impliedly repeal the local Act of June 12, 1907, P. L. 529.

The constitutional attack is laid upon a single ground, that the title of the statute violates article III, section 3, of our fundamental law, because it does not “clearly” express the subject-matter of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gentile v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Commonwealth v. HaldemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Graham v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Schrier v. RugglesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Poor District Case (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives & Granting Annuities v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Matthews v. LomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. HSP Gaming, L.P. v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. In Re Adoption of Elizabeth McCannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API