Legal Opinion

The Estate of Morton Liftin, John Liftin v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 29, 2013No. 10-589Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 10-589 (Filed: March 29, 2013) TO BE PUBLISHED ) THE ESTATE OF MORTON LIFTIN, ) Estate Tax Refund Claim; Reasonable JOHN LIFTIN, EXECUTOR, ) Cause for Late Filing; Reasonable ) Reliance on Advice of Counsel; Plaintiff, ) Substantial Variance; 26 U.S.C. § 6651; ) United States v. Boyle,

469 U.S. 241

v. ) (1985); Estate of La Meres v. Comm’r, 98 ) T.C. 294 (1992). THE UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Jonathan Edward Strouse, Holland & Knight, LLP, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff. Paul Galindo, Trial Attorney, Mary M. Abate, Assistant Chief, David I.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. United States v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API