Legal Opinion

Plumley v. Simpson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1903No. 4411PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Boyd J. Taixlman, Judge.

1Per curiam

— On February 6, 1902, the appellant, being then the holder of a certificate of delinquency of certain taxes assessed against lands belonging to the respondent, applied to the superior court for a judgment of foreclosure. A summons in the usual form was' issued and served, after which the defendant appeared and moved the court to stay the proceedings until a judgment for costs, which the respondent had obtained against the appellant in another proceeding brought by the appellant to foreclose the same certificate, was paid and satisfied; showing by affidavit accompanying the motion, the facts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bartelt v. SeehornWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Schwede v. HemrichWashington Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Swak v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Lownsdale v. Grays Harbor Boom Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Arthur v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API