Legal Opinion

Miracle v. Thompson

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1978No. 3559PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before BOOCHEVER, Chief Justice, and RABINO WITZ, CONNOR, BURKE, and MATTHEWS, Justices. CONNOR, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion to set aside a default judgment. We affirm.

On April 22,1976, Thomas and Mary Ann Thompson filed a verified complaint in superior court against their landlord, Homer Miracle. The complaint alleged that Miracle had disconnected the Thompsons’ electricity, assaulted and threatened Mary Ann Thompson, committed trespass, breached his statutory duties as a landlord, and violated an oral contract. The Thompsons also moved for a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allen v. BussellAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Alaska Placer Company v. LeeAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Hill v. VetterAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Markland v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Guard v. BensonAlaska Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Riley v. NORTHERN COM'L CO., MACHINERY DIV.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Kennecorp Mortgage & Equities, Inc. v. First National Bank of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Riley v. NORTHERN COM'L CO., MACHINERY DIV.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API