Legal Opinion
Semon v. Ledecky
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 16, 2004No. 99-0137; Civil Action Nos. 98-2731 (RMU), 98-2884(RMU), 98-3063(RMU), 98-0301(RMU), 98 Civ. 7871(SWK) (SDNY), 98 Civ. 8055(SWK) (SDNY), 98 Civ. 8200(SWK) (SDNY), 98 Civ. 8181(SWK) (SDNY), 98 Civ. 8417(SWK) (SDNY)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Dependants’ Motions to Dismiss
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the defendants’ motions to dismiss pursu*71ant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6), and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”). The plaintiffs bring suit against defendants United States Office Products (“USOP”) and its former Chief Executive Officer Jonathan Ledecky (“Le-decky”) for damages arising out of a strategic restructuring carried out by USOP. Because the plaintiffs do not state with particularity facts giving…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re US Office Products Securities LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004