Baxter v. Bank of Grantville
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. Assuming that where a wife is sued upon a note on which she is surety for her husband and on which she is not liable under the Civil Code (1910), § 3007, a note given by her and accepted in settlement of the pending litigation is a valid and binding obligation by her (Thornton v. Lemon, 114 Ga. 155, 39 S. E. 943), yet where the execution by a wife of a settlement agreement and a note in settlement, which manifestly constituted a benefit to the creditor by giving him a valid and binding obligation on an otherwise uncollectible debt, was procured by the creditor through the instrumentality…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Thornton v. Lemon, McMillan & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frick Co. v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Baxter v. Bank of GrantvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Sheffield v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934