Legal Opinion

Baxter v. Bank of Grantville

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 30, 1932No. 21927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Assuming that where a wife is sued upon a note on which she is surety for her husband and on which she is not liable under the Civil Code (1910), § 3007, a note given by her and accepted in settlement of the pending litigation is a valid and binding obligation by her (Thornton v. Lemon, 114 Ga. 155, 39 S. E. 943), yet where the execution by a wife of a settlement agreement and a note in settlement, which manifestly constituted a benefit to the creditor by giving him a valid and binding obligation on an otherwise uncollectible debt, was procured by the creditor through the instrumentality…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thornton v. Lemon, McMillan & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frick Co. v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Baxter v. Bank of GrantvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Sheffield v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API