Legal Opinion

Baxter v. Bank of Grantville

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 5, 1934No. 23281PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

“There is no matter of public policy more firmly fixed in this State than that which outlaws a contract of suretyship on the part of a wife in behalf of her husband, or the payment by the wife of any debt of her husband from the proceeds of her separate estate.” “A wife may recover her money which has been paid to a creditor of her husband in extinguishing his debt, even in a cash sale, with her funds, . . and where a wife executes a deed conveying her real estate to a creditor of her husband, she may, upon proof of the fact, proceed to rescind and annul the contract successfully and reassert…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Riley & Co. v. London Guaranty & Accident Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  2. Belt v. LazenbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Jones v. HarrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Jones v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  5. National Bank v. CarltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sylvania Electric Products Inc. v. Electrical Wholesalers Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  2. King v. LewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Hume v. Davison-Paxon Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  4. Baxter v. GormleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  5. Maddox v. GormleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API