Isaacson v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff failed to establish a contract by the defendant to carry him and his baggage from New York to New Orleans, via the "Mobile route" from Niagara Falls, as alleged in the complaint. On the contrary the proof conclusively negatived the existence of a through contract by the defendant. The only contract between the plaintiff and defendant for the carriage of the former was made at Niagara Falls, about July 1, 1876, through the purchase there by the plaintiff, of tickets for himself and family over the defendant's road from Niagara Falls to the city of New York, and from the latter…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cole v. Goodwin & StoryNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Quimby v. . VanderbiltNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Rawson v. . Pennsylvania Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Johnson v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lowenstein v. . Lombard, Ayres Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Talcott v. . Wabash R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Eddy v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Oakes v. N. P. R. R.Oregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Saunders v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.