Legal Opinion
Bieros v. Nicola
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 13, 1994No. 93-4485PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a pro se prisoner incarcerated at the state correctional institution in Grater-ford, Pennsylvania, has brought a motion for a temporary restraining order under Rule 65(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, in order to prohibit retaliatory action by defendants. For the reasons that follow, this motion will be denied.
In order to succeed under Rule 65(b), it must clearly appear from “specific facts shown by affidavit or by the verified complaint that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the applicant.”…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ecri, a Nonprofit Pennsylvania Corporation v. McGraw Inc., McGraw Information Systems Co., and McGraw Book Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Frank's Gmc Truck Center, Inc. v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
3Cited by75 opinions
- FMC Corp. v. Control Solutions, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Zaslow v. ColemanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Cerro Fabricated Prods. LLC v. SolanickDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Pileggi v. AicheleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Community Services, Inc. v. Heidelberg TownshipDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.