Legal Opinion
Pergament Norwalk Corp. v. Kaimowitz
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 6, 1985No. 2517PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
The plaintiff, Pergament Norwalk Corporation, appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing its complaint in an action seeking injunctive relief from a zoning variance granted to the defendant Discount Wines and Liquors, Inc.,1 by the Norwalk zoning board of appeals. The variance would enable Discount to build an addition to its liquor store which adjoins the plaintiff’s premises. The trial court, Ford, J., granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint on the basis of the plaintiff’s lack of standing to bring this action.
On appeal, the plaintiff basically claims…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of New Haven v. United Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Bridgeport Bowl-O-Rama, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Smith v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Blum v. Lisbon Leasing CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Breen v. Department of Liquor ControlConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- R & R Pool & Home, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- U.S. Vision, Inc. v. Board of ExaminersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Northeast Pkng. v. planning/zoning Comm., No. Cv93-0527558 S (Oct. 27, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
- Pergament Norwalk Corp. v. KaimowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985