Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Garner

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 18, 1997No. COA96-1531PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

Under North Carolina law, vicarious and independent acts of negligence may be a basis for third party liability. In this case, the plaintiff, whose vehicle was struck by a trucker, sought recovery from the companies that hired the trucker to transport sand from the sand pits to a customer. Because we determine that the companies are not vicariously liable under either State or Federal laws that regulate the commercial dump truck industry; and further, because we find that the trucker was an independent contractor, we affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bolkhir v. North Carolina State UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Hayes v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Lockwood v. McCaskillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Youngblood v. North State Ford Truck SalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. ConroyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Sheaffer v. County of ChathamDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
  3. Brown v. FlowersDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003
  4. Pulte Home Corp. v. American Southern InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. Rhoney v. FeleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API