Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Woody

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 28, 1988PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Mikoll, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 21, 1987, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits because he was not employed a sufficient number of weeks during his base period.

Claimant was employed as a purser by a steamship line. The employer discontinued the use of pursers and, in an agreement with claimant’s union, paid claimant severance pay from January 1986 to June 1986. Claimant ceased working on July 15, 1985 and filed an original claim for benefits effective July 21, 1986, thus establishing a base period from July 22,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of PolitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of JeffaresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of FuchsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. In re the Claim of KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. In re the Claim of MahmudAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. In re the Claim of GartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API