Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Mahmud

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 23, 1993PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 21, 1992, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he had insufficient weeks of covered employment.

Claimant worked for his employer from 1986 until his discharge on May 10, 1989. As a result of a grievance filed by his union, an arbitrator determined that claimant had been wrongfully discharged and ordered his reinstatement, with back pay for the period May 8, 1989 to October 1, 1989. Claimant thereafter returned to work on September 25, 1990. He sustained an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of WoodyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. In re the Claim of PolitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  3. In re the Claim of HinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. In re the Claim of LuxenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of OdellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API