Legal Opinion

Ruffenach v. Metro. Council

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 20, 2019No. A18-1786Published

1Opinion of the CourtHalbrooks, Judge

Relator challenges the dismissal by respondent Bureau of Mediation Services (BMS) of relator's petition under Minn. Stat. § 179A.25 seeking independent review of a grievance arising from his discharge from employment by respondent Metropolitan Council, Metro Transit Division (MTC). Relator asserts that BMS erred by determining that section 179A.25 does not apply because relator's employment was governed by a collective-bargaining agreement (CBA) with a grievance procedure that included independent review, even though relator's union elected not to pursue independent review of his discharge.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. J.D. Donovan, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  3. Boe v. Polk County Library BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  4. Alexandria Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. RostCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API