Legal Opinion

Miles v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1942No. 13999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Beid, Chief Justice.

The present writ of error involves a re fusal of the trial judge to entertain an “extraordinary motion for new trial,” filed by the plaintiffs in error in a case wherein they were defendants and James Arlon Johnson et al. were plaintiffs. The grounds set out in the motion as to why a new trial should be granted are not themselves extraordinary. They are grounds which might have been made in an ordinary motion timely filed, and not such as have subsequently arisen. Compare Cox v. Hillyer, 65 Ga. 57; Harris v. Roan, 119 Ga. 379 (46 S. E. 433); Wheeler v. State, 149 Ga. 473…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cox v. HillyerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  2. Harris v. RoanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Coggeshall v. ParkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  4. King v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  5. Castellaw v. BlanchardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barfield v. McEntyreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API