Legal Opinion

McCormick v. City of Lawrence

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided July 11, 2003No. CIV.A. 03-2195-GTVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VANBEBBER, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiffs Dale E. McCormick and Curtis A. Kastl II, proceeding pro se, bring this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants, Lawrence, Kansas police officers, the City of Lawrence, and a state prosecutor, violated their First, Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights during and after Plaintiffs’ arrests in July of 2002 and at various other times. All Defendants but the state prosecutor have moved to dismiss the action (Doc. 12) based on the doctrines of res judicata and qualified immunity and…

2Cases cited39 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Smith v. BarberDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004