Legal Opinion

Ross v. Ross

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1927No. Docket No. 5468PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion to modify a decree of divorce. The notice of motion, eliminating that part merely formal, is that defendant will move the court “to modify the decree and orders herein so that defendant shall pay the sum of $15 per month for the support of the minor child of plaintiff and defendant, instead of the sum of $25 per month as previously ordered herein; that'said child of said parties shall be known as Aileen Boss; that said child shall be taught respect and love for her father,” etc.

During the course of the argument…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bancroft v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Bancroft v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. MEGALOGENISBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API