Legal Opinion

MEGALOGENIS

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1964No. 1353Published

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #1353 MATTER or MEGALOGENIS In VISA PETITION Proceedings A-15152972 Decided by Board Jima 2,8, 1964 Since consummation by cohabitation is not required in a common-law marriage contracted "per verba de praesenti" in the State of Pennsylvania, the marriage contracted between petitioner, a TLS. citizen, and beneficiary, a citizen of Greece, aboard ship at Marcus Hook, Pa., in the presence of each other before witnesses, though not consummated by cohabitation, is a valid marriage and serves to confer nonquota status. The District Director at Philadelphia has denied nonquota…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Manfredi EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Caddy v. Johnstown Firemen's Relief Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Ex parte SuzannaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1924
  4. O'CONNOR v. JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1947
  5. Ross v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API