Legal Opinion

In the Interest of C.H.C.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2011No. 09-0480PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

When a pro se party seeks to appeal a trial court’s decision and properly files a sufficient and unchallenged affidavit establishing indigency and requesting a free record on appeal, the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure mandate that the party be provided the record. Because the affidavit in this case was not timely challenged, we reverse the court of appeals’ dismissal of this appeal and remand the case to the court of appeals for further proceedings.

Petitioner Christina M. Hawkins and Respondent Kyle Van Corey1 are the parents of C.H.C. In 2004, a Dallas County trial court entered an order…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Little v. Texas Department of Criminal JusticeTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Higgins v. Randall County Sheriff's OfficeTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Higgins v. Randall County Sheriff's OfficeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Griffin Industries, Inc. v. Honorable Thirteenth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Pinchback v. HocklesTexas Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Morris v. AguilarTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Ramirez v. GEICOCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  3. Buddy Kindle v. United Services Automobile Association, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
  4. In re HerediaTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Adrian Booker and Nicole Smith v. Anissa Mahmoudi, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2019

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API