Legal Opinion
In re Heredia
Texas Supreme Court
Decided September 30, 2016No. 16-0270PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
This petition for writ of mandamus asks whether a court reporter may challenge an appellant’s indigence claim after the ten-day deadline set forth in Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1. We hold that the Rule does not allow for an untimely challenge, even if the court reporter did not receive notice of the indigence claim.
Relator Norma Heredia sued Real Party in Interest Wal-Mart Stores Texas, L.L.C. for personal injuries she sustained from a slip-and-fall at a Wal-Mart store. Wal-Mart denied responsibility for Heredia’s injuries and moved for no-evidence summary judgment, which the trial…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rios v. CalhoonTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- In the Interest of C.H.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2011
- Morris v. AguilarTexas Supreme Court · 2012
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ramirez v. GEICOCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Remsburg v. MarquezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- David Rodriguez v. H-E-B, Jointly and Severally William Tate, Jointly and Severally and as Employee of H-E-B L.P., Stephen Martinez Jointly and Severally and as Employee of H-E-B L.P., Meredith Reid as Employee of H-E-B L.P, Jointly and Severally, Debra Ann Godoy as Employee of H-E-B L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2020
- Gordon Dean Haley, Anton Scott Haley, Gordon Dean Haley as Independent Co-Executor of the Estate of Margaret L. Haley and Anton Scott Haley as Independent Co-Executor of the Estate of Margaret L. Haley v. Beneficial Financial I Inc., Successor by Merger to Beneficial Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2021