Legal Opinion
Transunion Corp. v. Pepsico, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 7, 1986No. 85 Civ. 10058 (EW)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Transunion Corporation (“Transunion”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Union Industries, Inc. (“UII”), both Philippines corporations, commenced this action (“New York action”) on December 27, 1985, against PepsiCo, Inc. (“PepsiCo”), ten days after PepsiCo had commenced an action against Transunion and others in the Philippines (“Philippines action”). Essentially the two actions center about the same transactions and claims.
PepsiCo, in addition to motions directed at the complaint as a pleading, moves: (1) to dismiss the action on the ground…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Nilo D. Tuazon v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Transunion Corporation and Union Industries, Inc. v. Pepsico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co. (U.S.A.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- DeYoung v. BeddomeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Strategic Value Master Fund, Ltd. v. Cargill Financial Services, Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.