Legal Opinion
Benson v. Saffert-Gugisberg Cement Construction Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 4, 1924No. 23,930PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
After a trial by the court, this case comes here on appeal of the plaintiffs from the order denying them a new trial.
Plaintiffs, on April 17, 1920, became sureties on the bond of William H. Gugisberg, to secure the performance of his contract for the construction of a ditch. There was default by Gugisberg and plaintiffs have been compelled to pay some of the debts incurred by him in connection with the ditch contract. Among others, they paid the respondent, Saffert-Gugisberg Cement Construction Company (hereinafter referred to as the cement company), a considerable item representing the price…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Baldwin v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Eaton v. HastyNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
- United States & Canada Land Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Prince Investment Co. v. St. Paul & Sioux City Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Lund v. Wheaton Roller Mill Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Universal Title Insurance Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Barrett Bros. Co. v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Geo. A. Hormel Company v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Dennistoun v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Benson v. Saffert-Gugisberg Cement Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.