Legal Opinion

Wade v. Field & Country Meadows of Hershey

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

Decided May 23, 2013No. 2004 CV 2720 CVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TURGEON, J.,

— The issue presented in this case is whether a judgment creditor can garnish funds the judgment debtor prepaid to an assisted living facility for anticipated future expenses. As set forth below, I find that the prepaid monies are subject to garnishment under the facts presented and accordingly deny the garnishee’s petition to strike or open the judgment entered by admission upon a writ of execution.

Procedural and Factual Background

Plaintiffs Jerome and Cheryl Wade, husband and wife, initially brought this action in 2004 against Marjorie and Wendy Field, mother and daughter, to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sevast v. KakourasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Brown v. CandeloraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Dietrich Industries, Inc. v. AbramsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Hutchison v. HutchisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Kelly v. SiumaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jester v. HuttDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API