Jardine, Matheson & Co. v. United States
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The libelant contends that the libel is based upon tort, and that the stipulation only has relation to contract, and that in. any event the stipulation is without binding force as to the entire cargo. The libel clearly seeks to recover on contract of shipment. The testimony supports the shipping contract, the'bill of lading being in evidence containing the stipulation as above set out.
A stipulation in a bill of lading limiting fhe time within which claim for loss or damage shall b.e presented, and within which actions may be instituted, is valid, if…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. StarbirdSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Gooch v. Oregon Short Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Southern Pacific R. Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- The PersianaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- First Nat. Bank v. Rogers, Brown & Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1924
- Olivier Produce Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1927