Olivier Produce Corp. v. United States
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
An amended answer containing four affirmative defenses is filed. Libelant excepts to the second, third, and fourth affirmative defenses — to the second, because sufficient facts are not stated and that the defense has been waived; to the third, that the limitations set out are unrea-r sonable, invalid, and void, and sufficient' facts are not stated and that the defense has been waived; to the fourth, that the limitations are invalid, unreasonable, and void, that sufficient facts are not stated, and that the defense has been waived. An answer was filed March 9, 1927.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Phœnix Insurance v. Erie & Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Southern Pacific R. Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Wager v. Providence InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Washington & Idaho Railroad v. Cœur D'Alene Railway & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Miller v. International Freighting Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951