Legal Opinion
Empire Investment Co. v. Mort.
California Supreme Court
Decided November 16, 1915No. Sac. No. 2186PublishedCited by 4 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
This action greatly resembles the one which was the subject of the appeals in Empire Investment Co. v. Mort, 169 Cal. 732, [147 Pac. 960]. The same parties are involved in the controversy and the same contract which was there under consideration is important in this suit. In this as in that case the Empire Investment Company is suing in ejectment for possession of the same land which that corporation sought to retake in the earlier litigation. This appeal is from a judgment adverse to plaintiff.
The other appeals were pending and undetermined when the day arrived which was specified in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Oursler v. ThacherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Empire Investment Co. v. MortCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Gervaise v. BrookinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Champion Gold Mining Co. v. Champion MinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by4 opinions
- Malmberg v. BaughUtah Supreme Court · 1923
- Los Molinos Land Co. v. MacKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Los Angeles Investment Co. v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Sweet v. Richvale Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915