Legal Opinion

Steiner v. Blair

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 10, 1937No. 26001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

1. An assignment of error on the disallowance of an amendment can not be. considered by this court where no exception pendente lite was filed in the prescribed time, and where the final bill of exceptions was presented more than six years after the ruling complained of. The same rule applies to an assignment of error on the overruling of a demurrer. Boyce v. Day, 3 Ga. App. 275 (59 S. E. 930); Bullock v. Cordele Sash &c. Co., 114 Ga. 627 (40 S. E. 734).

2. An assignment of error on the disallowance of an amendment to a declaration can not be made by motion for new trial.

*4353. A suit oil a note was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boyce v. DayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Bullock & Co. v. Cordele Sash, Door & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Steiner v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Holsenbeck v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API