Bullock & Co. v. Cordele Sash, Door & Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Complaint. Before Judge Littlejohn. Dooly superior court. June 22, 1901.
1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.
1. Improperly allowing an amendment to a petition is the subject-matter of a timely and direct exception, but not a proper ground of a motion for a new trial.
2. Where a ruling allowing such an amendment was set out in the motion for a new trial as one of the grounds thereof, and subsequently made one of the assignments of error in a final bill of exceptions, and the latter was presented to the trial judge within thirty days from the overruling of such motion, but not within the time allowed by law for tendering such a bill of exceptions, such assignment of error came too late.
3. A ground of a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stewart v. Bank of Social CircleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lowery v. IdlesonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Turner v. BarberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Boyce v. DayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Carolina Locust Pin & Mica Co. v. Chattanooga Machinery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Hammond v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.