Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Thurman

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided January 7, 2013No. Criminal Action No. 3:10CR107-HPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, District Judge.

The Government has made pretrial motions for the admissibility of certain recorded jailhouse telephone conversations and for the testimony of a confidential source. All of which is to be used against Defendants in this case. The Court referred the matter to the Magistrate Judge who has produced a comprehensive seventy-four (74) page report and recommendation addressing each matter at issue.

The charges against Thurman and Robinson are that they conspired to use or attempt to use force and threats against a potential witness…

2Cases cited89 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. DennisonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Northbrook Bank & Trust Company v. 2120 Division LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
  3. State v. PriceOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Bishop v. Chicago Police Department, TheDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  5. Radair, LLC v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API