Legal Opinion

Julian v. Laubenberger

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1896PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Motion for a new trial on the minutes of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtStover, J.

This action is brought to recover damages upon the ■following facts: On June 29, 1894, the plaintiff purchased from the defendant -a can of prepared salmon. She prepared and dressed it within ap hour of the time of the purchase, and, with her family, ate of the salmon. She was taken violently ill, and remained so for some time. Others who- partook of. the salmon were also made ill. Evidence was given upon, the trial to show that the. salmon sold was unwholesome and unfit to be eaten.- The cause was .submitted to the jury, upon an instruction that there was an implied warranty upon' the -part…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moses v. MeadCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  2. Van Bracklin v. FondaNew York Supreme Court · 1815

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Flessher v. Carstens Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Foley v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1930
  3. Kirkland v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Walters v. United Grocery Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Hopkins v. Amtorg Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API