Legal Opinion

Chow v. United States

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided August 29, 2023No. 3:22-cv-00258Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA 4 5 PETER S. CHOW, 6 Plaintiff, 7 v. Case No. 3:22-cv-00258-SLG-KFR 8 UNITED STATES, et al., 9 Defendant. 10 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS 12 Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, like his initial complaint, remains difficult to 13 parse and in violation of Rule 8 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. As currently 14 pled Plaintiff continues to sue impermissible parties and fails to allege a cognizable 15 claim upon which relief may be granted. Therefore, the Court recommends 16 Plaintiff’s Complaint be DISMISSED with…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. John Crumpton, IV v. Daryl Gates Tom Bradley Tom Reddin Ed Davis Herbert Boeckmann Maxwell E. Greenberg Barbara L. Schlei Robert TalcottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API