Chow v. United States
District Court, D. Alaska
1Opinion
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA 4 5 PETER S. CHOW, 6 Plaintiff, 7 v. Case No. 3:22-cv-00258-SLG-KFR 8 UNITED STATES, et al., 9 Defendant. 10 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS 12 Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, like his initial complaint, remains difficult to 13 parse and in violation of Rule 8 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. As currently 14 pled Plaintiff continues to sue impermissible parties and fails to allege a cognizable 15 claim upon which relief may be granted. Therefore, the Court recommends 16 Plaintiff’s Complaint be DISMISSED with…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- John Crumpton, IV v. Daryl Gates Tom Bradley Tom Reddin Ed Davis Herbert Boeckmann Maxwell E. Greenberg Barbara L. Schlei Robert TalcottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.