Legal Opinion

Stone v. York Haven Power Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 2000No. 41 and 42 M.D. Appeal Docket 1999PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CASTILLE, Justice.

We granted allocatur to consider the question of whether the immunity provided by the Recreational Use of Land and Water Act, 68 P.S. § 477-1 et seq. (“RUA”), applies to a lake created by the damming of a river, to which the public has access for recreational activities. The Superior Court held that the damming of the river in question here constitutes an improvement to the natural state of the land and, therefore, immunity under the RUA does not apply to the lake. We disagree and, accordingly, vacate the order of the Superior Court and remand for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rivera v. Philadelphia Theological Seminary of St. Charles Borromeo, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Walsh v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Lory v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Commonwealth, Department of Environmental Resources v. AurestoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Mills v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ruspi v. GlatzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Stanton v. Lackawanna Energy, Ltd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Carrie A. McMellon Lori Dawn White Kathy D. Templeton Cheri Call v. United States of America United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  4. Murtha v. JoyceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Davis v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API