Legal Opinion

Baker v. Baker

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1924PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Motions to correct pleading, to separately state and number causes of action, to make complaint more definite and certain and to strike out unnecessary allegations in complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.

This is a stockholder’s action brought to restore to the defendant corporation, the C. J. Baker Company, Inc., property which it is claimed has been diverted from the corporation by the negligent or other wrongful acts of the defendants. Gen. Corp. Law, § 91a. The plaintiff, Henry A. Baker, and the defendant Charles J. Baker are brothers and another brother, George P. Baker, who does not appear as a party, was also concerned in the corporation. The other defendants except the C. J. Baker Company, Inc., are sons of the defendant Charles J. Baker. The plaintiff, Henry A. Baker, and his brother,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buckley v. StansfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  2. German American Coffee Co. v. DiehlNew York Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Moran v. VreelandNew York Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Penn Mart Realty Company v. BeckerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1972
  3. Quinn v. PostDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  4. Richmond Lace Works, Inc. v. EpsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  5. Kossoff v. Samsung Co.New York Supreme Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API