Legal Opinion
Richmond Lace Works, Inc. v. Epstein
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 16, 1962PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROAKE, District Judge.
Defendant moves for an order pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., dismissing the complaint in this action on the ground that the plaintiff has failed to join certain indispensable parties.
The plaintiff, Richmond Lace Works, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of Massachusetts with a principal place of business in Rhode Island, brings this action against the defendant, Thomas Epstein, a director, treasurer, and counsel to the plaintiff corporation. Jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship.
The complaint alleges…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Bath Gas Light Co. v. . ClaffyNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Kroese v. General Steel Castings CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- J. Baranello & Sons, Inc. v. Baharestani (In Re J. Baranello & Sons, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1992
- Independent Order of Foresters v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Fred Kuchenig v. The California CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Street v. VittiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Charron v. MeauxDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.