Legal Opinion

Saroian v. State of Oregon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 27, 1998No. 96C-11627; CA A96327PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying her petition for post-conviction relief in which she alleges that she was denied adequate assistance of counsel under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution, and the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. ORS 138.510 et seq. We review for errors of law, ORS 138.650; ORS 138.220, and reverse.

Petitioner’s claim was submitted for purposes of trial on the affidavits and memoranda of the parties without any in-court testimony or evidence. Petitioner was charged with committing the offense of assault in the fourth degree. ORS…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Trujillo v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Stevens v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Moen v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Chew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rodriguez-Moreno v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Stroup v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Chase v. BlacketterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. New v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API