Legal Opinion

Sousa v. Manta

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 29, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The plaintiffs brought their bill in equity to obtain dissolution of an alleged partnership and an accounting •of its affairs. The master to whom the cause was referred found that no partnership between the plaintiffs and the defendants had ever existed.. .The full evidence is not re*249ported. The plaintiffs’ motion to recommit the report was denied. Their exceptions to the report were heard and overruled, and it was confirmed. No appeal from the order or the decree was claimed. After hearing on the merits, the court entered a final decree dismissing the bill with costs. The case is here on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Glover v. Waltham Laundry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Weiss v. NewmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Fay v. CorbettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  4. Kronberg v. BulleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Kronick v. CorrealeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. J. W. Grady Co. v. HerrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Davenport v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Beacon Hill Credit Union v. TutunMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API