Legal Opinion
Kronberg v. Bulle
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 4, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
The plaintiffs and the defendant are owners of adjoining premises occupied respectively as a residence. This bill is brought for relief against acts alleged to have been committed by the defendant which caused the land of the plaintiffs to be undermined and to cave in, and certain structures upon it to be thereby damaged.
The case was referred to a master, who found that the plaintiffs built upon their land, along a portion of the dividing line between their land and that of the defendant, a wall and a concrete walk; that afterwards the defendant dug a trench in his lot along the face of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gilmore v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Thurston v. HancockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
- Hopkins v. American Pneumatic Service Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Fay v. CorbettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Fitzpatrick v. WelchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Crystal Concrete Corp. v. Town of BraintreeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Langdoc v. Gevaert Co. of America, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- New York Central Railroad v. Marinucci Bros. & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Gorton v. SchofieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Ledoux v. LariviereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.